One of the most frequent questions I get asked from Catholic advocates of LGBT equality is how to counter natural law arguments which condemn lesbian and gay relationships. For many people, natural law, with its basis in philosophy, can be a daunting area of knowledge to engage or refute. People tend to shrink from it more because it seems impenetrable than because they don’t want to acknowledge what its negative messages about LGBT issues. And the way it has been applied by Church leaders it seems to be not just a jumble of knots, but of “nots,” as well.
U.S. Catholic ran an essay “The Church might be approaching natural law in the wrong way,” by Patrick McCormick, a professor of Christian ethics at Gonzaga University, Spokane, Washington, which not only does a good job of explaining natural law theory, but interprets it in a way that can be used to affirm lesbian and gay relationships. This essay appeared in the magazine in October 2014, at the time we were busy covering the news of the first synod, so it eluded our attention, then. It recently appeared on our desktops, and, even though it was not published recently, we felt it was too good of a resource not to pass along to our readers.
- “Amours”: A Supportive Reading of Aquinas (queerchurch.com)
- Aquinas, In SUPPORT of Same–Sex Relationships.(queerchurch.com)
- John Corvino Responds to “New Natural Law” (Book, and Video) (queerchurch.com)
- “What’s Morally Wrong With Homosexuality?” [VIDEO]
- Louis Crompton on the “Theological Assault” of the Ulpianic-Thomistic Conception of Natural Law (Part II) (thewildreed.blogspot.com)
- A Conservative Catholic’s Contribution to the Journey Towards Marriage Equality (thewildreed.blogspot.com)
- Ignatian LGBTQ & Ally conference turns two (commonwealmagazine.org)